Skip to content
Home » Ranked Choice Voting

Ranked Choice Voting

people marching in a parade with various banners and signs that state "Rank Your vote! More Choice. More Power." in support of ranked choice voting

Image credit Tony Webster, 2017 MayDay Parade

Member Betty Keller on Ranked Choice Voting.

Ranked Choice Voting in the United States

As of April 2023, ranked choice voting is used for state primary, congressional, presidential, and local elections in 63 American jurisdictions reaching over 13 million voters. This includes two states (federal and state elections in Maine and Alaska), three counties (Santa Clara, CA, Benton and Multnomah, OR), and 58 cities. Hawaii has adopted but not yet implemented RCV. Military and overseas voters in six states cast RCV ballots in federal runoff elections. Voters in Burlington, Vermont approved and implemented ranked choice voting for the second time in March 2021.

Ranked choice voting is also used in seven countries around the world, including Australia and Ireland.

Credit: Fairvote

What is Ranked Choice Voting? 

Ranked choice voting (sometimes called instant runoff voting) is an electoral system of voting in which the voter ranks multiple candidates on their ballot in order of preference. 

Ranked choice voting improves fairness in elections as citizens vote for candidates they truly prefer and help elect candidates who are supported by the majority of voters.

Does Ranked Choice Voting favor one party over another?

Ranked Choice Voting is a nonpartisan voting system that does not favor any political party; it simply ensures that outcomes reflect the will of the majority of voters. 

Watch These Videos to Learn More:

How Does Ranked Choice Voting Work?

Voters mark their ballots with their first, second, third, or more choices, knowing that if their first choice does not win, their vote instantly counts toward their backup choice.

If a candidate draws more than 50 percent of all first-choice votes, they are declared the winner. 

If no candidate receives over 50 percent of first-choice ballots, the ranked choice tabulation process is then activated.

The candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated and voters, who selected this candidate as their number one choice, will now have their votes count toward their second choice. In other words, if your first choice is eliminated, your vote still counts; it just moves to your second-choice candidate. This process repeats with the candidate receiving the fewest votes eliminated each time, until one candidate emerges with more than 50 percent of the remaining votes and is declared the winner.

Making the change to Ranked Choice Voting ensures that:

Credit: Ranked Choice Voting for Texas, rcvfortexas.org
  • Candidates must gain broad voter support to win. Candidates must earn over 50 percent of the vote to win an election ensuring the winning candidate has majority support.
  • The fear of wasting votes on a candidate who cannot win is eliminated. The problem of similar candidates splitting the vote and enabling a candidate to win who is not supported by a majority of voters is avoided.
  • One party is not favored over the other. The outcome reflects the will of the majority of voters.

Advantages of Ranked Choice Voting

Offers voters more meaningful choices and improves fairness in elections. Voters need not fear about wasting votes on someone who can’t win or vote splitting. Voters know that if their first choice doesn’t win, their vote automatically counts for their second choice. 

Minimizes strategic voting. Instead of feeling compelled to vote for ‘the lesser of two evils,” voters can vote for who they believe is the best candidate without concern about the spoiler effect. 

Outcome is more reflective of the majority of voters. Giving voters more choices, diminishes the likelihood of voting along party lines and decreases political polarization, and encourages candidates to reach voters beyond their base. The winner is more reflective of the electorate.

Encourages civil campaigning and cooperation between candidates. Incentives for negative campaigning are removed as candidates have to appeal to their rivals’ supporters. Using negative campaigning may lose the second choice vote of voters whose first choice was treated poorly. Campaigns focus more on issues and more citizens may be willing to run for office, which can give voters more choices.​

Advances inclusive representation. Increases the percentage of women and candidates of color running for office, fosters diversity of views, and creates a richer dialogue on issues.

Promotes majority support. Voting continues until one candidate has the majority of votes, so the final winner has support of the majority of voters.  

Reduces the influence of money in politics. Candidates running in plurality elections need enormous amounts of money to run for office and defend against negative campaigning. As a result, wealthy donors, corporations, and special interest groups step in to supply candidates with unlimited access to money and gain undue influence over our elections. 

Objections to Ranked Choice Voting

It’s new. A certain percentage of people don’t like change. This can make them decide not to participate. 

Confusion with Ranked Choice Voting. Voters’ unfamiliarity with the new system could lead to confusion, ballots being filled out incorrectly, and a spike in nullified ballots. 

Too complicated. The most common criticism. Ranking candidates is more difficult than just choosing one. In addition to having to learn the background and positions of more candidates, voters also have to understand how votes are cast and counted. Moreover, instructions on the ballots can confuse voters.

Your Vote Might Not Count. Failing to rank all candidates may result in the ballot being discarded. Voters who do not rank all candidates on their ballot and their preferred candidates fail to make it to the final round of counting, will have their ballot eliminated in the count for the winner because their ballot is considered exhausted.

Too expensive. Initial investments will be required in the transition to ranked choice voting, which includes updating voting equipment and training. Counting of the ballots will be more expensive as it requires a computer system or counting by hand, which is labor intensive, with risk of errors.  

Delays results. Multiple rounds of tabulation means results will not be known immediately after polls close on Election Day, sometimes taking days or weeks.

Resources

Organizations 

FairVote. The country’s leading authority on ranked choice voting was founded in 1992 as Citizens for Proportional Representation. Researches and advance voting reforms, advises state and national partners on uses and implementations of ranked choice voting.

Ranked Choice Voting Resource Center. A division of the Election Administration Resource Center founded in 2019. Resource for voters, election administrators, candidates, and policymakers. Collects, distributes, and analyzes information regarding the adoption, implementation, and impact of ranked-choice voting. 

Rank The Vote. Founded by a group of volunteers dedicated to giving voters the choice to rank candidates for office in order of preference

rankedvote.co. Web app that makes it easy to create ranked-choice polls from any device. Reduces voter confusion with simple, realistic practice ballots. Free version. 

rcv123.org. Phone app that sets up, prints, and scans paper ranked-choice voting ballots and calculates results instantly. Free.

Videos

League of Women Voters of Vermont. Ranked Choice Voting in a Presidential Primary PSA. 2023 (51 seconds)

Ranked Choice Voting Resource Center. History of Ranked Choice Voting in the United States. 2017 (47 minutes)

FairVote. Proportional #rankedchoicevoting Explained. 2023 (4 mins)

Minnesota Public Radio News. How does ranked-choice voting work? 2013 (2.17 mins)

FairVote. What is Ranked Choice Voting? 2000 (2.29 mins)

Reports

New America. The Short-Term Impact of Ranked-Choice Voting on Candidate Entry and Descriptive Representation. 2023. Results of how ranked-choice voting affects the number and types of candidates who choose to run for office.

FairVote. 2022 Ranked Choice Voting Year in Review. Interactive end-of-year report highlights RCV election results and adoptions, with attention to Alaska and Virginia.

Congressional Research Service. Ranked Choice Voting: Legal Challenges and Considerations for Congress. 2022. Examines several federal and state legal challenges and identifies some potential legislative options for Congress.

New America. What We Know About Ranked-Choice Voting? 2021. Systematic overview of the literature on RCV in the United States. Research examines the reform’s effects on voters, candidates, campaigns, and policy.

Podcasts

Ranked Choice Voting Resource Center. VPIRG, Vermont, and Very Interesting Legislative Questions. April 27, 2023

Ranked Choice Voting Resource Center. RCV Clips.  Monthly.

History

Ranked-choice voting (RCV), an alternative voting system that allows voters to rank multiple candidates on a ballot in order of preference, is also known by different names including instant-runoff voting (IRV), single transferable vote (STV), alternative vote, and preferential voting. 

The origins of ranked choice voting can be traced back to the late 13th century and Ramon Llull from the Kingdom of Majorca. Four hundred and fifty years later, in 1770, Jean-Charles de Borda (1733 –1799), French mathematician and physicist, formulated a ranked preferential voting system (Borda count) that was used for almost two decades by the French Academy of Sciences to elect its members. About the same time, Marie Jean Antoine Nicolás de Caritat, marquis de Condorcet, (1743-1794), French philosopher and mathematician, developed the Condorcet method to determine collective preference. 

In the 19th century, interest in ranked voting was renewed in Britain and Denmark with the development of the Single Transferable Vote (STV). Englishman Thomas Wright Hill (1763-1851), mathematician and schoolmaster, is credited with inventing STV in 1819. Carl Christoffer Georg Andræ (1812-1893), Danish politician and mathematician, established the STV system that was used in Denmark’s parliamentary elections beginning 1856. Around 1857, British barrister and political scientist, Thomas Hare (1806-1891) popularized the idea of proportional representation and STV (Hare system) across the British Empire.  And, in the United States, in 1870, William Robert Ware (1832-1915), first professor of architecture at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, dabbled briefly in voting systems and used the idea of STV to devise Instant Runoff Voting (Ware’s method). 

Tasmania used ranked voting for government elections in the 1890s followed by Australia in the 1910s. By the 1920s, ranked voting was used in cities in Ireland, South Africa, Canada, and United States. In the modern era, countries using RCV include Malta, New Zealand, and Scotland.

In 1915, Ashtabula, Ohio was the first city in the United States to use RCV to elect its City Council. By the early 1940s, two dozen cities across six states used RCV. However, unrelenting repeal efforts between 1915 and1962 led to its successful reversal in all but one city –   Cambridge, MA. 

In the last two decades, RCV has seen resurgence in cities like Minneapolis, San Francisco, and Tacoma Park, MD. And, in 2018, Maine became the first state to use RCV for all general congressional elections. As of 2022, Alaska adopted the use of ranked choice voting in its federal and state elections. In Nevada, pending a vote of approval in November 2024, the state will use ranked voting for state and federal elections but not presidential.

Vermont

In 2005, Burlington adopted Instant Runoff Voting (a form of ranked choice voting) for its 2006 and 2009 mayoral elections; voters repealed the system in 2010. In late 2019, efforts to revive ranked choice voting for mayor, city, and school board elections were successful. The League of Women Voters of Vermont was a partner in the Better Ballot Burlington Initiative campaign advocating for ranked choice voting in city council elections. Voters approved and implemented ranked choice voting in Burlington for the second time in March 2021. On May 27, 2023, it became law without Governor Scott’s signature.

Resources

 U.S. Elections and Ranked Choice Voting: An Early History, in Five Acts by Howie Fain on behalf of Rank The Vote. 2022.

The History of Ranked Choice Voting. Ranked Choice Voting Resource Center. Chris Hughes talks with Morgan Chase. (audio: 15.32 minutes.) 2018.

History of Ranked Choice Voting in the United States. Ranked Choice Voting Resource Center. Jack Santucci, Ph.D., Georgetown University and Chris Hughes, FairVote. (video: 47 minutes.) 2017.

League Position

More to come

INFORMATIONAL WEBINARS
Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) may be coming to Vermont in time for the 2028 presidential primary elections. And, the Vermont Secretary of State and League of Women Voters wants you, the voter, to get a better understanding of this method of voting.

Register for a two-part forum to learn more about Ranked Choice Voting and how it works. Questions or comments? Message Betty Keller, bkeller@lwvofvt.org
Guide to Million Dollar Success
My Website
INFORMATIONAL WEBINARS
  • May 1, 7:00-8:30pm: Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) Overview
  • May 8, 7:00-8:30pm: Ranked Choice Voting for Vermont: Impact, Considerations, Opportunities